Astronomers have obtained new clues that help unravel the mysteries surrounding the strange asymmetry present on the far side of the Moon.
The different distribution of radioactive elements after the catastrophic moon formation collision may help explain the strange asymmetry in the composition of the lunar sides.
Earth’s Moon exists in such a way that it has a ‘near side’ that is perpetually oriented towards Earth and a ‘far side,’ which always points away from Earth. The composition of the near side of the Moon is strangely different from its far side.
Earth’s Moon is a cold body and features a limited amount of water and little tectonic processes beneath the surface.
Scientists currently believe that the Earth-Moon system was formed when a body the size of Mars nicknamed Theia, who in Greek mythology was the mother of Selene, the goddess of the Moon, collided catastrophically with proto-Earth, causing the components of both bodies to mix.
The debris from this collision is believed to have separated fairly quickly, perhaps over a few million years, to form Earth and the Moon.
Earth ended up being bigger and evolved into a sweet spot in terms of its size, resulting in a dynamic planet with an atmosphere and oceans.
Earth’s Moon, on the other hand, ended up being smaller and did not have enough mass to accommodate the characteristics that make our planet unique.
Decades of observations have shown that lunar history was much more dynamic than expected, with volcanic and magnetic activity occurring just a billion years ago, which is much later than previously expected.
A clue to why the near and far sides of the Moon are so different comes from a strong observable asymmetry in its surface characteristics.
On the perpetually near-Earth side of the Moon, on any night or day, one can observe dark and light spots with the naked eye.
The first astronomers called these dark regions ‘maria‘, which in Latin means ‘seas,’ reasoning that they were bodies of water by analogy with Earth.
Using telescopes, scientists were able to discover more than a century ago that these were not actually seas, but rather craters or volcanic features.
However, since the Moon is close to Earth, only about 380,000 km away, it was the first body in the Solar System that humans were able to explore, first using unmanned spacecraft and then up-close, on-site, when Apollo landed the first humans on a cosmic body other than Earth.
In the late 1950s and early 1960s, unmanned space probes launched by the USSR returned the first images from the far side of the Moon, and scientists were surprised to discover that the two sides were very different.
The far side-often mislabeled as the “dark side”–had almost no Maria. Only 1% on the far side was covered with Maria compared to 31% for the near side.
Scientists were puzzled but suspected that this asymmetry offered clues to how the Moon came to be.
In the late 1960s and early 1970s, NASA’s Apollo mission saw six spacecraft land on the lunar surface, and astronauts brought 382 kg of moon rocks to try to understand the origin of the Moon by analyzing its chemical characteristics.
By analyzing the lunar samples, scientists quickly determined that the relative darkness of these patches was due to their geological composition and, in fact, were attributable to volcanism.Scientists also identified a novel type of rock signature called KREEP: short for potassium-enriched rock (chemical symbol K), rare earth elements (REEs, which include cerium, dysprosium, erbium, europium, and other elements that are rare on Earth. ) and phosphorus (chemical symbol P), which was associated with maria.
But why volcanism and this KREEP signature should be distributed so unevenly between the near and far sides of the Moon again presented a puzzle.
Using a combination of observation, laboratory experiments, and computer simulations, scientists from the Institute of Earth Life Sciences at the Tokyo Institute of Technology, the University of Florida, the Carnegie Institution for Science, Towson University, NASA Johnson Space Center and the University of New Mexico have produced some new clues to how the Moon gained its near and far side asymmetry.
These tracks are linked to a major KREEP property. Potassium (K), thorium (Th), and uranium (U) are, fundamentally, for this story, radioactively unstable elements.
This means that they occur in a variety of atomic configurations that have varying numbers of neutrons.
These atoms of variable composition are known as ‘isotopes,’ some of which are unstable and break apart to produce other elements, producing heat.
The heat from the radioactive decay of these elements can help melt the rocks in which they are contained, which may partly explain their joint location.
This study shows that, in addition to improved warming, the inclusion of a KREEP component in rocks also reduces their melting temperature, increasing the expected volcanic activity from simply radiogenic decomposition models.
Because most of these lava flows were located early in lunar history, this study also adds restrictions on the timing of the Moon’s evolution and the order in which various processes occurred on the Moon.
The results of this study, published in Nature Geoscience, suggest that the KREEP-enriched Maria of the Moon has influenced lunar evolution since the Moon formed.
“From thermal numerical modeling, we show that radiogenic heating compounds this effect and may have resulted in an asymmetric concentration of post-magma-ocean crust building on the lunar nearside,” the researchers wrote in their study.
“Our findings suggest that the nearside geochemical anomaly has influenced the thermal and magmatic evolution of the Moon over its entire post-differentiation history,” scientists concluded.