3 Stumping Reasons Why We Still Don’t Know the Age of the Egyptian Pyramids

How do we know how old the pyramids are? The truth is that most of what we "think we know" is based off of assumptions, circumstantial information, and archaeological guesswork.

How do we know how old some of the pyramids on Earth are? It’s a tough question to ask.

Although Egypt is perhaps the country whose pyramids are most famous on Earth, the African country isn’t home to the oldest pyramids, nor the largest on Earth.

It is believed that the oldest pyramids are located half-way across the world in the American Continent.

In Brazil, researchers uncovered more than 2 decades ago what many argue are the oldest pyramids on Earth, dating back around 5,000 years.

In comparison, it is maintained by mainstream Egyptologists that the Egyptian pyramids are no more than 4,700 years old.

Specifically, scholars say that the Step Pyramid of Djoser, believed to have been commissioned by the founding ruler of the Third Dynasty, was the first pyramid that was built in Egypt.

But how exactly do we know that? It’s a tricky thing dating the pyramids, and it is something mainstream scholars are unwilling to acknowledge.

If we were to follow the mainstream point of view of the age of the pyramids, then we would have to acknowledge that the oldest pyramid is that of Djoser, an that it was built around 2,780 BC. Considered the first free-standing monument built of stone, the architect of the megastructure decided to use mostly stone to complete the ancient wonder.

Modern knowledge of Djoser’s Step Pyramid can be traced back to the early nineteenth century. Nonetheless, it is known that travelers, explorers, and writers visited Saqqara in ancient times leaving behind several accounts and sketches. None of them, however, offer insight on the interior of the Step Pyramid.

In fact, it is believed that the earliest excavations of the Step pyramid are those of Prussian Consul-General von Minutoli, in 1821. He managed to access the subterranean galleries beneath the pyramid making several discoveries, of which the blue-tiled chambers are considered the most prominent.

Von Minutoli discovered inside the pyramid parts of a mummy and vague descriptions making reference to the name Djoser. The mummy is generally attributed to the third dynasty and based on the wrapping and preservation of the same, it is linked to the Old Kingdom, leading many experts to believe it is part of Djoser’s Mummy, which is curiously missing.

An image of the Step Pyramid of Djoser. Shutterstock.

A timeline of Pyramid building

How do we know hold old the pyramid is? And how do we know the exact timeline of ancient Egyptian Pyramids?

You see, in Egypt, the pyramid as a superstructure seemed to have appeared abruptly, and its alleged initial shape—the step pyramid—did not last long.

Mainstream history tells us that after Djoser, a few pharaohs tried constructing a pyramid as the step pyramid at Saqqara but failed. It wasn’t until the Fourth Dynasty when pharaoh Sneferu came to the throne that another pyramid was built.

King Sneferu is credited with building three pyramids and successfully building the first true sided-pyramid of Egypt, and by doing so laid down the foundations for the construction of the Great Pyramid of Giza.

But how do we know this timeline is correct? How do we know the age of the pyramids? The truth is, there isn’t a direct approach.

There are many people who want to believe that the pyramid of Egypt predates the ancient Egyptian civilization, or that the structures were built with the help of beings, not from Earth or even long-lost civilizations. The evidence that has been gathered throughout the decades by archeologists is no more than circumstantial, and Egyptologists themselves have come to accept that virtually all information in archeology is circumstantial.

For reason we are unsure, there are no ancient texts whatsoever that speak of the construction of the first pyramid. There are no blueprints, nor are there any details on how the ancient Egyptians built the pyramid, or what their exact purpose was.

The truth is, there’s no one easy way that we know what the date of the pyramids happens to be. It’s mostly by context. In other words, most of what we know about ancient civilizations, particularly those that may have existed before the ancient Egyptians is no more than scientific guesswork.

However, there must be a way that we can, at least approximately, find how old the pyramids are.

Scholars say that there are ways. Many of the ancient Egyptian pyramids are surrounded by ancient cemeteries or mastaba-like tombs. Inside these tombs are the mummified remains of people. As experts open, study and analyze the tombs, the find from time to time organic materials like reed fragments, wood, or even wooden coffins. Many of these tombs have yielded the bones of people who were buried inside them.

Such things can be submitted to radiocarbon dating, but that does not tell us much if anything about the pyramids. It just tells us about the people that were buried besides these magnificent structures.

Aerial view of the Step Pyramid of Djoser at Saqqara. Shutterstock.

The pyramids, on the other hand, are primarily dated by their position in the development of Egyptian architecture.

Since there are no written documents mentioning the construction of the pyramids, their purpose, or their meaning, it is near impossible for us to known who built them, what they were exactly built for, and how old they are.

How do we date the Pyramids?

So, what do scholars use as a starting point for dating the pyramids? The pottery, they say, is one example. As noted by renowned Egyptologist Mike Lehner, the pottery fragments at Giza looks very much like the pottery of the time of Khufu, Khafre, and Menkaure.

“We study the pottery and how it changes over the broad sweep, some 3,000 years. There are people who are experts in all these different periods of pottery or Egyptian ceramics,” explained Lehner in an article dealing with the age of the Egyptian pyramids.

He further goes to explain that if you were, for example, digging around the base of the Empire State Building, assuming it was an ancient ruin, and all that surrounds it is desert and dirt, and you were to find ceramics typical of the Elizabethan era or the Colonial Period you’d trace the building to that era.

However, if you were to find plastic and Styrofoam cups, you’d place the building as being constructed by the culture of the 20th century. Lehner explains that as a scientist, you’d then go on to compare the style and architecture of the Empire State Building (hypothetically in ruins) to other structures like the Chrysler Building, and the Citicorp Building, in order to see whether nor not similar architectural characteristics are present.

You’d then probably have enough evidence to lace the Empire State Building and the area where it was built in the modern 19th and 29th centuries, and you would know that the buildings do not date to the 14th or 15th centuries.

In my view, this logic is flawed and we can’t possibly rely on that type of reasoning to date a certain building to a particular period of time.

Here’s why.

Take for example the magnificent Step Pyramid of Djoser, and its massive subterranean underworld. Beneath the pyramid are hundreds of rooms, chambers, and magazines that were built at least some 4,700 years ago.

You’d assume that the items inside these chambers would date back to that very same period of history.

But to the surprise of experts, when the chambers were broken into by archeologists, they discovered items that were traced back to a period of time generations prior to Djoser.

If we were to use the logic set forth by Lehner or other Egyptologists we’d be given reason to believe that the Step Pyramid of Djoser was not built by him, but predates Djoser by several generations. We could also assume then that Djoser took possession of the pyramid, and redesigned it to fit his needs.

On the other hand, Saqqara, where the Step Pyramid was built– also features dozens of tombs that surround the Step Pyramid that date to a time long after Djoser.

With the above reasoning, we could then also go on and assume that the pyramid of Djoser is much younger than what scientists currently believe.

Radiocarbon dating has been performed at Giza in the past. For example, researchers have analyzed the boat pits next to the pyramids discovering that the remains of the so-called solar ships date back to around 2,600 BC. Since the boats are located next to the pyramids, Egyptologists assume the boats belong to the King who built the Pyramids. Since the boat dates back to 2,600, then the Egyptologists assume so do the pyramids, and the man who commissioned them was Khufu.

Radiocarbon dating the Pyramids?

You can’t obvious radiocarbon date rock. Nonetheless, several decades ago, reachers managed to radiocarbon date the pyramids thanks to organic material embedded within the spaces between the massive stones.

In 1984, analysis shows that the pyramids were much older than what was initially accepted with tests giving dates of 10,500 BC. Obviously, this did not fir the timeline we all are accustomed to, so we kept digging.

Not long after more studies were performed. Although experts did not obtain a date around 10,500 BC, the pyramids turned out to be several hundred years older than what Cambridge Ancient History (the Cambridge Ancient History is a reference) tells us. In fact, the pyramids were dated around 374 years older than what we usually agree they are.

This, however, isn’t evidence that the pyramids are younger or older than our historical timeline tells us. It is no more than evidence that we can’t possibly try and date the ancient Egyptian pyramids without enough material.

At the end of the day, all we have is circumstantial and based on scientific guesswork.


Created with love for the passionately Curious. Curiosmos.com was created with two words in mind: Curious and Cosmos. See what we did there? Curious: /ˈkjʊərɪəs/ eager to know or learn something. Something strange; unusual. Cosmos /ˈkɒzmɒs/ the universe seen as a well-ordered whole. A system of thought. You could say that Curiosmos is the Cosmos for the curious reader.
Back to top button

Adblock detected :(

Hi, we understand that enjoy and Ad-free experience while surfing the internet, however, many sites, including ours, depend on ads to continue operating and producing the content you are reading now. Please consider turning off Ad-Block. We are committed to reducing the number of ads shown on the site.